The story behind Saraswati : myth or reality?
Hello people! Back again.π
So friends, how are you all enjoying your winters?
Pretty good! right?πππ
HMM! After a long gap, I thought I should write…... so I again
started scrolling/searching for the topic. While searching for a new topic for
my blog, I was finding something repetitive, something that could engage you
throughout, ( not sure of your mood swings though), and something which was a mystery, until
solved recently.
I read as many articles as I could, from different news sites: The
Hindu, Firstpost, Down to Earth, HerZindagi, Hindustan Times, News18, The wire……… and a few
more………π΅πΆπ«!
And what I saw more interesting here is that all these sites tell
the news of the same thing but from different years, and wondered Why so much
coverage for this news.
So, now here is another
blog……which you may find interesting, as it keeps you revolving around the history,
geography, a little folklore, and some myths about the existence of the river
Saraswati.
Some 10,000 years ago, there
were believed to be many mighty rivers that flowed from the Himalayas and that
allowed civilizations to prosper in the green, fertile, cool
climate on the riverbanks in northwestern India, such as
Rajasthan. Archaeologists have determined that ample precipitation and large
flowing rivers enabled settlers to be prosperous farmers. Then, 6,000 years
ago, one of the mightiest rivers, the Saraswati, dried up, forcing inhabitants
in the area to relocate elsewhere. Over
the years, there have been several attempts to locate or recreate the
course of the 'lost' Saraswati River by interpreting the information
available in the Vedas. For instance, the Nadistuti hymn in
the Rigveda mentions the Sarasvati between the Yamuna in
the east and the Sutlej in the west while another describes it
as flowing into a Samudra. Late Vedic texts such as the Tandya
Brahmana, Jaiminiya Brahmana, as well as the Mahabharata, refer to
the Sarasvati drying up in a desert.
BTW how many of you know that
the goddess Saraswati and river Saraswati are the same???
I
bet many of you were not aware of this!π
π
So, according to Hindu mythology, after
the creation of the cosmic universe by Lord Brahma, a great
pandemonium reigned supreme in the cosmos. But Brahma felt bewildered
for he realized that his cosmic universe was bereft of order, conception and
configuration. He created the embodiment of wisdom and art. Goddess
Saraswati emerged out of His mouth.
Then all the celestial bodies
including the sun, the moon, and the stars were created and organized
under strict orders. The oceans sprang up and the seasons started
changing periodically. Ecstatic Brahma named the Goddess Vagdevi, the
goddess of speech and sound. In this way, Brahma created the Universe
equipped with the eternal source of wisdom provided by the Goddess
Saraswati.
In the Devi Mahatmya, Goddess Saraswati is one of the female Trinity i.e. Tridevis comprising Maha Kali, Maha Lakshmi, and Maha Saraswati. They are the consorts of the trinity of Lord Shiva, Lore Vishnu, and Lord Brahma. In the process of creation, maintenance, and destruction of the Universe, all three goddesses also played pivotal roles. Maha Saraswati is depicted as eight-armed sitting on a white lotus flower. There She is wielding in Her hands the bell, trident, plowshare, conch, pestle, discus, bow, and arrow. All these suggest that Maha Saraswati was not merely the goddess of knowledge and arts. Again it is thought that Goddess Saraswati, the metaphysical form of the Rigvedic River Saraswati, with Her watercourse of consciousness and knowledge, dispelled all the abysmal darkness of ignorance from the universe.
Hindu text contains numerous
legendary tales about Devi Saraswati. Here is a short story mythical or real, the
judgment is yours. π
Her father Brahma was so enamored by
Saraswati's radiant beauty and astute intellect that He was resolved to wed His
daughter. But Saraswati was so enraged by Brahma's incestuous obsession with
His daughter that she became anxious to avoid his lustful stare. She was going
away from Brahma's line of sight. All of her efforts, however, were fruitless
since Brahma simultaneously generated three more visages to cover each of the
four corners of His vision. To satisfy His daughter's carnal beauty lover's
yearning, a southern face with pallid cheeks, a western face with quivering
lips, and the fourth face with amorous beauty all emerged. Then Saraswati
adopted several animal disguises. However, Brahma pursued Her while disguising
Himself as those animals' male equivalents. Saraswati flew high into the
heavens after being unable to find another way to avoid His lewd stares. The fifth
head was then made by Brahma, and it had a neck long enough to pierce the
heavens and pursue Saraswati with His passionate gaze. As a result, Brahma knew
Saraswati would never be able to escape His attention. Unhappy with the amorous
attentions he bestowed upon her, she tried to dodge and hide. This is why the
river Saraswati flows underground. And the brief appearance she made
aboveground is the moment, legends assert, that she stopped to rest from her
tiring run. She swore that Lord Brahma would not be respected and worshipped
as widely as Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva. The angry goddess then condemned Her
father for showing unrestrained passion, which she claimed caused the earth to
be overtaken by lust and longing, planted the seeds of unhappiness, and
imprisoned the soul in a cage made of flesh and blood.
How much would you rate my storytelling?ππ Hehe, do not mind me this much. Okay!π»
So, we have several ancient Indian texts that have
provided detailed descriptions of the Saraswati River. Among these, the oldest is
the Rig Veda, where the Saraswati River is described
as the mightiest and the best among all rivers, despite the term saras meaning a lake. The epic Mahabharata too mentioned the Saraswati as lost in the
desert sands and then reappearing at different places in its downstream course,
thus making it clear that the composer was aware of Saraswati losing its flow
strength. Here it must be noted that ancient Indian texts, including the Vedas,
were later compilations of much older verses and sermons that dealt with all
aspects of life and environment that were passed on through generations
following the ancient oral traditions, and were in a literal sense akin to an
enormous knowledge bank accumulated over millenniums. The Rigveda, for example, mentions a mighty river that originates in the
Himalayas and flows southwestwards. The Mahabharata speaks of a river that
disappeared underground near the present-day town of Sirsa in Haryana. Besides,
the geographical history of the now arid western Rajasthan points to the fact
that the region used to be green and did not lack water resources. Barely
10,000 years ago, the whole region was host to a big river system, which
attracted civilizations like the Mohenjodaro and Harappa.
Religious myths, oral history, and
scientific research overlapped in this search for the Saraswati, which forms
the Hindu holy triumvirate along with the Ganga and Yamuna, and the
hypothetical confluence of these three rivers in Allahabad is the source of
humanity’s biggest gathering every 12 years during the Kumbh Mela.
Can you tell where these three rivers meet?
Anyone here?
U people are too weak in GK. ππ
Anyways the answer is Triveni sangam.
However, was the river ever actually there? Despite
several allusions to Saraswati in the Vedas, academics have been unable to
pinpoint the river's course or connect it to now or formerly existing river
systems.
The
Saraswati, named after the goddess of learning, finds mention in the epic
Mahabharata and ancient Hindu texts such as the Rig Veda. History has it that
the river supported the Harrapan civilization nearly 4,500 years ago. But the
current hunt is for the river’s course depicted in the Survey of India’s 1913
and 1969 topographical sheets, according to which the Saraswati flowed through
Haryana, Rajasthan, and Gujarat before draining into the Arabian Sea. Originating in the high Himalayas, the Saraswati
is believed to have descended to the plains from Adi Badri, situated in the
Shivalik foothills, joining the Arabian Sea at the Rann of Kutch. But these
longstanding geological views have been challenged by a spate of research
papers published in the last few years, backed up by refined satellite imagery,
topographic analysis, and more precise dating techniques.
The first
evidence of the ancient underground channels came in the 1930s when scientists
Haren and B C Gupta from the geological survey of India spoke
of the channels. They claimed that they might belong to the river Saraswati.
Bimal Ghose, the former scientist at Central Arid Zone Research Institute,
Jodhpur, also made a reading based on the topography map of Rajasthan. He
confirmed that the ancient channels were a dead river that could well be
Saraswati. It may be mentioned here that ancient literature and texts and the region’s
geographical history were constant bases of reference in these studies. The existence of a once-vast river that ran
through northwest India and was 5 miles (8 km) wide has recently been confirmed
by scientists. They also discovered that it dried up 4,000 years ago, at the
same time as the Saraswati vanished. Its demise is thought to have been
triggered by both climate and geology. Drilling boreholes to look for water
beneath the desert in the same location is being done by remote sensing
scientists in collaboration with Indian water experts. The water they have so
far pulled from the riverbed's depths has a carbon age of around 4,000 years.
Along the river's path, approximately a thousand archaeological sites have also
been found. Many people think that the historic Saraswati riverbed maybe that.
Summing
up here, like many cultural memes, the legend of Saraswati is part of Hindu
religious identity and is alive in the minds of thousands of believers. But
like all memes, these ideas are built up over several generations,
incrementally embellished with time however we cannot deny the evidence found
in recent research. the multiple paleochannels of the Ghaggar-Hakra system have
been better understood by recent studies using satellite imaging, which began
in the 1970s and are still ongoing. These photographs have also made it quite
evident that there is a complicated network of canals that used to be a vast
river. Due to the abundance of studies on the subject, this merits separate
consideration, discussion, and possibly a distinct article. To put it all
together, the majority of these current scientific studies indicate the
following: the existence of a large river that previously flowed between the
current courses of the Sutlej and Yamuna rivers.
Hope you enjoyed the swings throughout the article ππ
Do comment on what you think about it, any suggestions and queries
are most welcome here.
Share it if you like. π₯Ίπ₯Ί
Very nicely written, π₯°
ReplyDeleteπππ»π»ππ
ReplyDeletenice content.! nice topic.! nice presentation.!
ReplyDeleteop bhai !π
ReplyDeleteGood work ✊π
ReplyDeleteAchha likha h bro .......very nice !π
ReplyDeleteGreat writeup!
ReplyDeleteNice only... π
ReplyDeletegood job! nice content.
ReplyDeleteInteresting!!!
ReplyDeleteGood work !
ReplyDeleteWell written
ReplyDeleteGood job Nelbert Neinstein...
ReplyDeleteGreat work .keep it up !
ReplyDeleteCertainly a good read!π
ReplyDelete